A tense television interview has ignited a firestorm online, with critics accusing CNN of attempting to undermine an independent journalist whose reporting triggered federal action.
At the center of the controversy is Nick Shirley, whose viral investigation into alleged fraud at Minnesota daycare centers has drawn national attention and swift government response. Now, the network’s handling of his reporting is facing sharp scrutiny.
Viral Investigation Sparks Federal Action
Shirley went viral last week after releasing a 42-minute video examining Minnesota daycare centers that appeared inactive while still receiving millions of dollars in government funding.
The reporting had immediate consequences. Federal officials launched investigations, and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services froze all childcare payments to Minnesota.
Yet rather than focusing on the alleged fraud itself, critics say CNN turned its attention toward Shirley.
On-Air Interview Raises Eyebrows
On Tuesday night, CNN correspondent Whitney Wild interviewed Shirley in a segment featured on “Anderson Cooper 360.” During the interview, Wild pressed Shirley about his reporting methods and said the network was “looking into” his claims.
As part of the segment, Wild attempted to contact several daycare centers featured in Shirley’s video. Many did not answer.
“Only one daycare facility answered and said they are a legitimate business,” Wild told viewers.
That moment quickly became the focal point of widespread backlash.
Social Media Erupts Over CNN Segment
Within hours, critics across social media accused CNN of missing the larger story. Many argued the network appeared more focused on scrutinizing Shirley than investigating alleged fraud.
Some online users mocked the segment, suggesting the network had taken the word of a single daycare without further verification.
Others were far less subtle.
The criticism only intensified as prominent commentators weighed in.
Prominent Voices Pile On
The popular account Libs of TikTok posted a scathing summary of the segment, writing, “CNN disputes that there’s fraud in Minnesota Somali daycares because they called a bunch of daycares, one answered so they asked if they’re committing fraud, and the daycare responded that they’re not. I’m not kidding.”
New York Post columnist Miranda Devine also criticized the approach, writing, “What an embarrassment, @CNN. She interviews @nickshirleyy in person but not the day care center. And then she takes the word of the one day care center she contacts by phone — but does not visit — that they are legit? Seriously?”
The criticism was not limited to pundits.
Journalists Question CNN’s Focus
While Shirley himself labeled the segment a “hit piece,” other journalists questioned the editorial choices behind the reporting.
“So CNN’s angle here is to try and discredit @nickshirleyy while patting authorities for pursuing fraud on the back. But hilariously, two minutes in, the network buries the lede. ‘We reached out to several of the daycares featured in the now-viral video. Only one daycare facility answered and said they are a legitimate business.’ Just take the one person’s word for it,” journalist Benjamin Weingarten responded.
Meanwhile, federal investigations continue, including probes by Immigration and Customs Enforcement into suspected fraud sites tied to a potential multibillion-dollar money trail.
CNN Silent as Criticism Mounts
As backlash spread, CNN did not immediately respond to requests for comment regarding the online reaction to the segment.
The controversy highlights a broader debate about media priorities, independent journalism, and how major outlets respond when viral reporting forces government action.
For many critics, the question remains simple: why focus on discrediting the messenger when the message prompted federal intervention?
